It was all about how modern and slick it looks and how it has so many more features. They were surprised this even works, because it was never mentioned by the folks who trained them on the new software. So I asked why they don't just ignore the mouse and keep using tab. The new version ran on Windows, had a lot more features for sure, but suddenly staff was entering data into a field, grabbed the mouse to move to the next field, entered data, and so on. Staff could use it in their sleep, enter text, tab, enter more text, tab tab, and so on. The old one ran on some Unix iirc, had a text mode interface, and was entirely controlled by keyboard. The most notorious example I remember was an update to data entry software in the medical field. The modern ones without a home button are just too complicated for a whole swath of our population, and I am not exaggerating. I set up a lot of iPads for elderly folks for use in assistive communication, and I have to go out of my way to use ones that have buttons. Look at how well-known McMaster's site is, among people who actually need to use it to get work done.Įven in general public terms, things have gone too far. But then you start trying to get actual work done, and the Fisher Priced interface is too simplified.Īnd I know it's not just you or me that prefer information dense websites. People almost always pick the simpler of two options, because at the time they have no reason to pick anything else, and that looks easier. In normal use, however, that flavor of Pepsi was too sweet, and sales tanked. I may be misremembering the details, but the gist was that Pepsi was a bit sweeter, and so in the tiny amounts that people tasted during taste tests, they usually prefer the sweeter drink. I think a lot of modern web design suffers from the same AB testing failures that got Pepsi into trouble back in the coke/pepsi days of the 80's.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |